A middle-market business is worth what a capable buyer will pay for its future cash flows, and buyers get to that number the same way almost every time: a measure of normalized earnings, usually adjusted EBITDA, multiplied by a factor that reflects the company’s size, growth, risk, and industry, then translated into a deal structure that determines how much of the headline number the seller actually receives and when. Owners tend to fixate on the multiple. Professionals watch the adjustments and the structure, because that is where the real money moves.

Valuation was my daily work as an investment banking managing director, and it remains the foundation of my legal practice, because every document in a deal exists to protect or transfer a piece of the value. This article explains the machinery honestly, including the parts sellers are rarely told.

What number actually gets multiplied?

Adjusted EBITDA is reported earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization, normalized for items that will not continue under a buyer: owner compensation above or below market, personal expenses run through the company, one-time legal or moving costs, above- or below-market rent paid to a related landlord, and revenue or costs that will not recur. Sellers propose add-backs; buyers and their quality of earnings accountants contest them; and the negotiated result is the number the multiple actually touches. A dollar of defensible EBITDA is worth the full multiple, which is why documentation of every add-back is some of the highest-yield preparation a seller can do.

Buyers also read the direction and quality of the number. Growing earnings command more than flat ones at identical levels, revenue under contract counts for more than revenue re-won annually, and margins that behave consistently through the trailing years suggest a machine rather than a streak. In smaller companies, buyers may use seller’s discretionary earnings instead, which adds back the full owner compensation on the theory that the buyer will work in the business. Knowing which measure your likely buyers use is the first step of realistic expectation-setting.

What sets the multiple?

Size first: larger companies earn higher multiples for the same industry because their earnings are statistically safer, and the steps between EBITDA tiers are real valuation cliffs in both directions. Then the risk profile: customer concentration, supplier dependence, owner dependence, competitive moat, and the durability of demand in the sector. Then growth, both demonstrated and credibly projected. Industry matters because buyers price sectors differently, and within a sector, the strategic landscape matters, because a company that several acquirers need is priced by competition rather than by formula.

That last point is the honest core of the multiple conversation: multiples are observed outcomes, not entitlements. The ranges quoted at conferences describe what competitive processes for prepared companies achieved. A single negotiation with one buyer for an unprepared company sits below the range for reasons no benchmark can fix. Which is why process design, the subject of a later article, is itself a valuation lever, and why the banker’s real product is competitive tension rather than a spreadsheet.

One under-discussed input deserves naming: the credibility of the projections. Buyers pay some portion of the price for the future the seller describes, and a forecast built from named drivers, pipeline, pricing actions, capacity, signed contracts, gets underwritten, while a straight-line extrapolation gets discounted. The forecasting discipline built in the planning years becomes negotiating currency in the process, one more asset that cannot be manufactured in deal time.

Why are price and terms inseparable?

Because the headline number is a package of very different dollars. Cash at closing is worth face value. An earnout is worth face value discounted by the probability of hitting the targets and the enforceability of the covenants around them. A seller note is worth its terms and the buyer’s credit. Rollover equity is worth what the next exit makes it worth. Escrows and indemnity holdbacks are contingent. Two offers with identical headlines can differ by a third in expected value, and the discipline of pricing each component is what separates advised sellers from flattered ones.

Working capital mechanics deserve their own respect, because they move real money at closing. Deals close with an agreed level of working capital in the business, and the peg negotiation, what counts, how it is measured, which season it reflects, routinely shifts six and seven figures in middle-market deals. The same is true of the treatment of debt-like items: deferred revenue, customer deposits, accrued bonuses. None of it appears in the multiple conversation, and all of it appears in the wire transfers.

Certainty is the final term that behaves like price. An offer without financing contingencies, from a buyer with committed capital and a record of closing, is worth genuinely more than a higher number resting on a lender’s future appetite, and advised sellers routinely take the smaller certain number. Pricing certainty honestly is uncomfortable, because it means admitting the biggest number on the board may not be the best one.

How should an owner use a valuation?

As an instrument panel, not a verdict. A credible range, built from your actual financials by someone who transacts in your size and sector, converts exit planning from philosophy into arithmetic: which value levers are worth pulling, what the after-tax proceeds would fund, whether the gap between today’s range and your number is closable by time and work or only by luck. Refreshing it annually costs little and keeps the panel current.

And use it to stress-test the offers that arrive unsolicited, because they arrive precisely calibrated to feel large. A buyer who approaches you directly is buying the absence of competition, and the premium they skip is usually larger than the fees a process would have cost. The valuation work, like everything in this series, points the same direction: information early, prepared options, and the discipline to price what is actually being offered rather than what is being announced.

Frequently asked questions

What multiples do businesses actually sell for?

Ranges vary widely by size and sector, from the low single digits of EBITDA for small owner-dependent companies to high single digits and beyond for larger, growing, well-positioned ones. Published ranges describe competitive processes for prepared sellers; individual outcomes are earned, not assigned.

Is revenue or EBITDA more important to buyers?

For most operating companies, normalized EBITDA drives the price, with revenue multiples reserved for high-growth or recurring-revenue models where earnings are deliberately reinvested. Even then, buyers underwrite the path to profitability rather than the revenue line alone.

Should I get a formal valuation before talking to buyers?

Get a transaction-grade range from an advisor who sells companies like yours; a formal appraisal document is usually unnecessary for sale planning. The range disciplines your expectations, prices your planning decisions, and arms you against the unsolicited offer designed to anchor you low.

Talk with Robert

Valuation is where preparation becomes money, and I’ve priced it from both chairs for nearly 30 years. I lead M&A and ownership-transition work at AEGIS Law. Reach me at rgold@aegislaw.com.

By Robert Gold, Managing Attorney, Mergers & Acquisitions, AEGIS Law

This article is for general information only and is not legal advice. Reading it does not create an attorney-client relationship with AEGIS Law.

Select Categories

Strategic Engagement

Consult with our Managing Partner.

Ready to review your enterprise risk or legacy strategy? Schedule a direct consultation with Scott Levine using the link below.

Schedule an Appointment

BOOK NOW


Call Us

(314) 454-9100